By Paul Robinson
Wars opposed to Freud were waged alongside nearly each entrance up to now decade. Now Paul Robinson takes on 3 of Freud's so much bold critics, mounting a considerate, witty, and finally devastating critique of the historian of technological know-how Frank Sulloway, the psychoanalyst Jeffrey Masson, and the thinker Adolf Grnbaum. Frank Sulloway contends that Freud took so much of his rules from Darwin and different modern thinkersthat he used to be whatever of a closet biologist. Jeffrey Masson fees that Freud caved in to see strain whilst he deserted his early seduction idea (which Masson believes was once right) in desire of the concept of childish sexuality. Adolf Grnbaum impugns Freud's declare to have grounded his ideasespecially the belief of the unconsciouson strong empirical foundations. less than Robinson's rigorous cross-examination, the facts of those 3 accusers proves ambiguous and their arguments biased via underlying assumptions and ideological commitments. Robinson concludes that the anti-Freudian writings of Sulloway, Masson, and Grnbaum show extra approximately their authors' prejudicesand concerning the Zeitgeist of the earlier decadethan they do approximately Freud. fantastically crafted and entire of surprises, Robinson's paintings is a compelling safety of 1 of history's most unusual and robust minds. Freud and His Critics will earn an everlasting position within the raging Freudian debate.
Read Online or Download Freud and His Critics PDF
Best historiography books
Do historians reconstruct the truthor easily inform tales? Professor John Arnold indicates they do either, and that it’s the stability among the 2 that issues. In a piece of metahistory (the research of historical past itself), he's taking us from the superb stories of Greek Herodotus to the various techniques of modern day pros.
The China-Burma-India crusade of the Asian/Pacific warfare of worldwide warfare II was once the main complicated, if now not the main arguable, theater of the complete battle. Guerrilla battle, commando and distinct intelligence operations, and air strategies originated the following. The literature is huge and this booklet offers an evaluative survey of that huge literature.
Examines the paintings of 4 significant historians, Turner, Beard, Hofstadter, and Williams, and exhibits how smooth occasions have compelled a transformation within the writing of yankee background.
During this paintings of sweeping erudition, one among our best historians of early Christianity considers numerous theoretical opinions to envision the issues and possibilities posed by means of the ways that heritage is written. Elizabeth Clark argues forcefully for a renewal of the learn of premodern Western historical past via engagement with the types of severe tools that experience reworked different humanities disciplines in fresh a long time.
- Cultural Movements and Collective Memory: Christopher Columbus and the Rewriting of the National Origin Myth
- The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History
- Black Athena: The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization: The Linguistic Evidence, Vol. 3
- Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology: A Research Annual (Volume 29-A)
- Rethinking American Indian history
- The Historians of Late Antiquity
Extra info for Freud and His Critics
Rather, they were at all times guided by a single-minded consciousness of the political advantages of presenting Freud as a lonely proponent of unpopular ideas. To this end they denied his biological debts, transformed Fliess into a crackpot, promoted the self-analysis beyond all reason, and ignored his intellectual affinities with his contemporaries. Sulloway’s conception of the biographers’ motives is as unnuanced as his conception of Freud’s own motives. He insists on a strictly conspiratorial view of their enterprise.
But set beside the slash-and-burn, scorched-earth manner of Masson, Sulloway sounds decidedly pedantic. His sentences are overburdened and ornate, while Masson’s are direct, simple, and breezy. Above all, Masson writes in the charged language of moral indignation, his discussion of historical questions giving way easily and often to personal judgment and ad hominem attack. His idiosyncrasies notwithstanding, with Sulloway one never doubts that the real issue is one of intellectual history—of getting Freud’s story properly told.
To this end they denied his biological debts, transformed Fliess into a crackpot, promoted the self-analysis beyond all reason, and ignored his intellectual affinities with his contemporaries. Sulloway’s conception of the biographers’ motives is as unnuanced as his conception of Freud’s own motives. He insists on a strictly conspiratorial view of their enterprise. In the final segment of his book, its emotional bones are fully bared, as Sulloway’s supposedly admiring biography climaxes in an orgy of Freudian mendacity and self-promotion.