Download Inequality in School Discipline: Research and Practice to by Russell J. Skiba, Kavitha Mediratta, M. Karega Rausch PDF

By Russell J. Skiba, Kavitha Mediratta, M. Karega Rausch

This edited quantity fills a serious void by means of delivering the most up-tp-date and authoritative info on what's recognized approximately disciplinary disparities. tuition exclusion—out-of-school suspension and expulsion in particular—remains a considerable portion of self-discipline in our nation’s colleges, and people outcomes proceed to fall disproportionally on convinced teams of novices. The unfavorable effects of common and inequitable use of faculty exclusion are giant, together with greater premiums of educational failure, dropout, and get in touch with with the juvenile justice procedure. As educators, policymakers, neighborhood leaders, and different youth-serving organisations commence the tough paintings of constructing extra equitable university disciplinary platforms, the necessity for powerful disparity-reducing possible choices couldn't be extra vital. Drawing at the multi-year ground-breaking paintings of the self-discipline Disparities Collaborative, the chapters during this publication offer leading edge wisdom helping a brand new nationwide central to dispose of race, gender, incapacity, and sexual orientation-based disciplinary disparities.

Show description

Read or Download Inequality in School Discipline: Research and Practice to Reduce Disparities PDF

Best administration books

Leadership Gender and Culture in Education

This edited variation includes chapters through prime students on gender and academic management, which draw on study on leaders in simple, secondary, and postsecondary faculties around the globe.

Good Teachers, Good Schools: How to Create a Successful School (David Fulton Books)

'Good faculties imagine with humans and never to humans' argues David Hudson during this thought-provoking sensible consultant for these desirous to bridge the distance among center and senior administration roles, and make a distinction of their colleges. Accessibly and engagingly written and filled with real-life examples, this ebook will end up crucial studying for bold academics and deputy heads all over.

Additional resources for Inequality in School Discipline: Research and Practice to Reduce Disparities

Example text

2011), but the micro-level processes that cause this are not well-understood. J. SKIBA ET AL. intervention. , Pollock, 2009; Kahn & colleagues, this volume). , 2015). Gregory, Bell, and Pollock (this volume) identify equity-based principles of conflict prevention and intervention. Guidance is needed on how educators can effectively talk about race/ethnicity, difference, and power in a way that produces positive change rather than reinforces stereotypes (see Buehler, 2012; Carter, Skiba, Arredondo, & Pollock, 2014; Howard, 2010; Pollock, 2009).

Myth #6: Interpersonal bias on the part of educators toward students is the sole driver of disciplinary disparities. Although educators’ perceptions play a role in disparities, it would be an error to ascribe fault solely to them. Disciplinary disparities are systemic and multi-determined by a host of policy and practice decisions and contextual variables (APA, 2008).  Department of Education, 2014). The meta-narratives of safety and order, concentrated poverty, and cultural deficiency contribute to a deeply rooted and widespread belief that exclusionary discipline is both necessary and normal.

There are indeed personal and community factors, such as poverty, single-parent households, low-achievement, or repeat offending that increase a student’s risk of school failure, dropout or delinquency. But the research evidence makes clear that out-of-school suspension and expulsion are in and of themselves risk factors for a host of negative school and life outcomes, regardless of levels of poverty, achievement, or previous behavioral history (Skiba, Arredondo, & Williams, 2014). SOLUTIONS AND INTERVENTIONS Emerging data indicate that schools and school systems have the power to change their rates of exclusion.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.72 of 5 – based on 46 votes