By Keith Jenkins
During this attractive sequel to Rethinking heritage, Keith Jenkins argues for a re-figuration of historic research. on the center of his survey lies the conclusion that aim and disinterested histories in addition to old 'truth' are unachievable. The previous and questions about the character of heritage stay interminably open to new and disobedient approaches.Jenkins reassesses traditional background in a daring model. His dedicated and radical examine provides new methods of 'thinking history', a brand new method and philosophy and their influence on ancient perform. This quantity is written for college kids and academics of historical past, illuminating and altering the middle in their self-discipline.
Read or Download Refiguring History: New Thoughts on an Old Discipline PDF
Similar historiography books
Do historians reconstruct the truthor easily inform tales? Professor John Arnold indicates they do either, and that it’s the stability among the 2 that issues. In a piece of metahistory (the learn of heritage itself), he's taking us from the brilliant stories of Greek Herodotus to the various ways of modern day pros.
The China-Burma-India crusade of the Asian/Pacific battle of worldwide struggle II used to be the main complicated, if no longer the main arguable, theater of the complete conflict. Guerrilla war, commando and specified intelligence operations, and air strategies originated the following. The literature is wide and this e-book presents an evaluative survey of that massive literature.
Examines the paintings of 4 significant historians, Turner, Beard, Hofstadter, and Williams, and exhibits how glossy occasions have compelled a metamorphosis within the writing of yank historical past.
During this paintings of sweeping erudition, one among our most desirable historians of early Christianity considers numerous theoretical evaluations to ascertain the issues and possibilities posed via the ways that heritage is written. Elizabeth Clark argues forcefully for a renewal of the learn of premodern Western background via engagement with the categories of severe tools that experience reworked different humanities disciplines in fresh a long time.
- Developments in Modern Historiography
- Critical Discourse Analysis in Historiography: The Case of Hong Kong’s Evolving Political Identity
- Doing Oral History (3rd Edition)
- History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe
- The Reformation. A Religious Revolution
- Twentieth-Century Sexuality: A History (Family, Sexuality and Social Relations in Past Times)
Extra info for Refiguring History: New Thoughts on an Old Discipline
What does all of this mean and how does it work? Well, let me start by claiming that operating here is what might be called in turn two guiding principles. The first is that to get meaning into the world through a discursive practice such as history there is always an unavoidable tension between any ideal concept (which Derrida calls the transcendental gesture) and its empirical or material inscription. That is to say ± to begin to explain this ± that although in every case the ideal concept of History is the motivation for its empirical working-out or elaboration, the empirical world is always unable to realise the full potential of the ideal.
9 But as if this were not bad enough for the defenders of the faith, the so-called facts are themselves interpretive constructs as well. Consequently, the impact on history of the collapse of facts into interpretive phenomena further undercuts the use of facts as the basis for a resistance to semantic freedom, for interpretations are of course value judgements. This deserves attention for just a few more pages. 10 For Barthes, historians perform a sort of magic whereby what is just a discursive concept ± `the facts' ± are projected into a realm supposedly outside of discourse from which they can then be thought to determine the very 44 Last order(s) discourse which posits them as facts in the first place.
Sean Burke, The Future of Biography) Even though historians are aware that strictly speaking it may not be possible to get rid of all their present-day assumptions and presuppositions that are, actually, the very things that allow them to think historically at all, most still try to do so. Most professionals still hold that the aim of history is, to recall, to understand the past on `its own terms' and `for its own sake' uninfluenced as much as humanly possible by their own `historical context' for fear of committing the deadly sins of anachronism and distorting hindsight.